Wednesday, 29 July 2009

Accountability for all?

Accountability is a phenomenon which if done with all honesty and veracity can eliminate all the ills from the society and can pull the nation towards prosperity and progress. If we see the history of our country we would find a number of times when political leaders of this country chants the slogans of Accountability to others for polishing their own selves, but till now none called for an across the board Accountability for all, regardless of his affiliation and status. This is why we are still standing not too far away where we were standing 55years back.

Now a day we are again witnessing these songs of Accountability in our country and this time this not only from politicians but these chants are coming from the “respected” supreme court of the country. Who all are committed and set for the accountability of Former President of the Country Gen. Ret. Parvez Musharraf over what he did on 3rd of November 2007 which according to them was Un Constitutional and can be trialed under Article 6 of the constitution of Pakistan (1973) which states that:

 

6. High treason.

1. Any person who abrogates or attempts or conspires to abrogate, subverts or attempts or conspires to subvert the Constitution by use of force or show of force or by other unconstitutional means shall be guilty of high treason.

2. Any person aiding or abetting the acts mentioned in clause (1) shall likewise be guilty of high treason.

3. Parliament shall by law provide for the punishment of persons found guilty of high treason.

Before going over my main point I would like to discuss one more important thing i.e. why Supreme Court is only just concerned about the act of 3rd November 2007? However similar kind of act was done by same person on 12th October 1999? Why no one wants to mention that and impeach that act also? Well may be because that October ’99 act was a fruitful one for “respected” Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry as it elevated him to the Supreme Court from Baluchistan High Court after he took oath under the P.C.O. of that time presented by Gen. Parvez Musharraf, but on November 2007 same person, same act and his P.C.O. becomes bad as it took away the seat of “respected” Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.

Coming back to the point, let for the sake of argument if we consider Gen Ret. Parvez Musharraf guilty of Article 6 clause (1) of constitution of Pakistan, then there is another clause in Article 6 after this which says:

Article (6) Clause 2:

  • Any person aiding or abetting the acts mentioned in clause (1) shall likewise be guilty of high treason.

So according to this clause “respected” Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry is also equally culpable and guilty of Article 6 i.e. of high treason and should be impeached and set accountable in front of the nation. Because:

  • C. J. Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was among the first judges who took oath under the P.C.O. of Gen. Parvez Musharraf in January 2000 and got promotion to Supreme Court from Baluchistan High Court to fill the vacancies left by those judges who refused to take oath under the P.C.O.

  • April, 2005 C. J. Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was among the 5 judges who dismissed all the petitions against Gen. Parvez Musharraf’s constitutional amendments including 17th Amendment, his Uniform and Legal Framework Order hence Validating Gen. Parvez Musharraf’s acts of suspending the constitution, allowing him to keep two offices (i.e. of President and Chief of Army Staff).

So, according to the constitution of Pakistan (1973) C. J. Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry is also guilty of Article 6 as he abetted the acts of Gen. Parvez Musharraf which he and his companions now calls “unconstitutional”. And honest demand of Accountability is that if Gen. Parvez Musharraf is going to be asked for his acts then C. J. Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry should also be.

And not only are these two personalities’, acts done by an illegal or unconstitutional person also illegal and unconstitutional so all the acts by these two are also illegal including:

  • National Reconciliation Order (N.R.O.) by Gen. Ret. Pervez Musharraf, and
  • Cases handled by C. J. Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry including “plane hijacking case” and “Sharifs ineligibility case”.

 

Respect Constitution, Respect Accountability

Accountability for All!

Saturday, 25 July 2009

Firing over J.S.Q.M.’s Rally and Unasked Justification from A.N.P. .

An Unfortunate Incident:

Today, again Karachi was in news throughout the day because of an another unfortunate event occurred during the J.S.Q.M. (Jiye Sindh Qaumi Mahaz)’s rally in Karachi. The Rally was targeted by two gunmen loaded with kalashanikovs, in retaliation J.S.Q.M. workers killed one of the attackers and other was arrested with injuries. The incident occurred when the JSQM’s rally reached Race course road near Safora Goth chowringi, where the rally was targeted by those Gunmen. Violent incidents and protest in interior parts of Sind and national highway Karachi occurred following this incidents.

Obvious One:

Seeing the scenario this incident can’t be termed as unexpected, J.S.Q.M. a party which is on the hard line over the issue of Swat IDP’s coming to Sind, taking out a procession in A.N.P. dominated area (Safora Goth), who are the biggest advocate of I.D.P.s settlement to Sind, rifts between these two parties had also created misfortunes in past, ethnic riots in Karachi and firing over the J.S.Q.M.’s procession which claimed many lives earlier this year are the fresh examples.

So, nothing peaceful can be expected when J.S.Q.M. will hold a procession in front of A.N.P. . what can be said about the violent activities of A.N.P. but for their own benefit they should they should learn to act a little. And even this was not it, just 1 or 2 hours after the incident A.N.P. Sind President showed up in a Press Conference saying that this incident is a play to create rifts between J.S.Q.M. & A.N.P. .

 

Well, There are few Question need to be answered:

Why Mr.Shahi Syed did came on T.V. so hurriedly, giving justification of “No A.N.P. involvement” in the incident, who asked for it? “Is it the self-Guilt of a failed plan” or a fear to be Nominated because of which he himself is saying “hum ne tu yeah jurm nai kia”?

Mr.Shahi Syed said “it’s a plan to harden the relationship between two parties”, well before this he should tell that when the relationship between two parties got softer?

What a great person Mr. Oscar wilde was, who said:

“It is the confession, not the priest, that gives us absolution” .

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Building collapsed in Liaqatabad, Karachi, several Causalities Feared

Just In: Building collapsed in Liaqatabad, Karachi, several Causalities Feared.

News is just in that a four storey building has been collapsed near Firdous Shopping Mall (Formerly known as Firdous Cinema), several people are reported to be  trapped under the debris of the collapsed building and several causalities are feared, relief and rescue activities have been started by respected department with collaboration with locals . more detail is yet un known.

Remember the building was a four storey construction but in that area more than 2 storey are prohibited, K.B.C.A. was being informed by the town office about this illegal construction but no actions were taken by them.

Monday, 20 July 2009

Swapping the sides across the “Great BRIDGE” of Karachi.

It’s just the story of 5, 6 years back when the southern side of the Great Bridge which includes most prominently DHA and Clifton’s area was known as a status symbol, a place having well developed civic facilities compared to the other side of the city i.e. Northern which was supposed to be an under developed and lacking basic daily civic needs. And that opinion was also justified till an extent.

But in the last few years things have changed dramatically, today as compare to 5 years back it seems that someone has just turned the Great Bridge of Karachi, the Story of South is now the present of North and so as the other way round.

Today the Northern side of the Great Bridge seems having a better basic Civic structure and its seems like a developed area but when you crossed the bridge and land over northern side (Clifton and then Defence) it seems like a plain land of an small town with (is its moon soon’s season) stagnant water over the roads which have those deep and ‘strange’ so called storm water drainage system.

No matter what the side is north or south, at the end it belongs to Karachi and Karachiites also lives there. With the Grace of All Mighty ALLAH we have seen tremendous development in the northern part of Karachi of which C.D.G.K. is responsible but is there anyone who could ask to the Southern Guardians of Karachi i.e. D.H.A. and Cantonment who takes more from public compared to the other side but still they seems delivering less. ?

del.icio.us Tags: ,,,

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

Target Killings in Karachi are targeted by whom?

The rope of target killing is not again stretched in Karachi which has claimed many precious lives till now while mostly of the victims are political party’s activists.

In Karachi everything seems unpredictable, things come out from nowhere and in a very short span of time they start hovering over the news, whether it’s about weather or law and order.

Now, Target killing is also one of them, before that Karachi was facing political rifts but they got settled somehow but know this new phenomenon is on the scene.

But if we see them a little closely you would find that everything has a back ground and building and so as the verge of Target Killing, i.e. some people don’t want peace and stability in Karachi, they have been found involved in most of the unrest in Karachi directly or indirectly.

And as far as the cause of target killings is concerned the roots of this killing lies in Punjab specially Mianwali and Lahore. Surprised? Ok then answer this:

 

Imran mediating between Haqiqi factions

KARACHI: Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan has been trying for the last few months to broker a deal between the two factions of the Mohajir Qaumi Movement (MQM-Haqiqi) that split during the previous government’s tenure, The News has reliably learnt.

Emerging as a staunch opponent of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) after the May 12, 2007 mayhem in which several political workers were killed in Karachi, Imran Khan subsequently launched a campaign against the Muttahida. His anti-Muttahida drive started with the help of the MQM-Haqiqi which provided him with evidence of alleged brutalities against it.

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,

Saturday, 11 July 2009

Sumaila Rana, another PML (N)‘s MPA involved in a credit card theft scandal.

Another Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N)’s MPA Shumaila Rana is now found involved in credit card theft scandal, she is been accused of doing shopping over someone else’s credit who when found out that her credit card is being used reported the case to the police.

A video that’s being recorded by the cctv camera of famous jewellery store Bijoux also clearly disclosed Shumaila Rana sitting at the store and checking out jewellery items:


Morever Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz’s (PML-N) investigation committee has demanded Shumaila Rana to resign after being found guilty, but she refused to resign immediately.